Thursday, October 14, 2010

BONEYARD

135# hang squat clean thrusters x 10
burpees x 10
double unders x 20
115# hang squat clean thrusters x 15
burpees x 10
double unders x 20
95# hang squat clean thrusters x 20
burpees x 10
doubles unders x 20

for time

4 comments:

  1. Cody in Indiana

    9:38 rx'd

    Coming off a vacation I thought I was fresh. Boneyard quickly stole that feeling from me. Excellent wod.

    P.S. Keep us posted on these competitions I'm very interested.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 7:37

    The jury is still deliberating on the utility of the hang squat clean thruster. The program evolved from hang cleans and thrusters, morphing into the final format. In the interest of pioneering new movements, test trials are necessary to evaluate effectiveness. In this case, resetting from the overhead position posed several issues. Reestablishing proper position was difficult. Resetting the feet from the landing position between each repetition can only be accomplished once the bar is returned to the hang. This eliminated the ability to rapidly cycle the exercise with precision. Not a specific “NO GO” criteria, as focus on efficiency and execution is always a basic tenant. However, the first time combination of these two movements made implementation require forethought, transforming smooth motion to forced coordination. Additional experimentation and familiarization is needed to train the mind so the body can follow.

    Cody, will do. I plan on posting some media and my overall results from the event.

    ReplyDelete
  3. long before i knew what a squat clean was, had done very many thrusters, or did things "for time" on a regular basis i stumbled upon the "Mutant Maker" while looking at mountain athlete. (www.mountainathlete.com) in the past we had used it extensively at The Shop but somehow it ended up on the back burner and eventually fell completely off the oven. whether it be in a circuit format or as a stand alone movement the effectiveness of the hang squat clean thruster is undeniable. 100 for time at 95lbs ended up being quite a trip. although i see your point and agree that it could be a little awkward at times, overall i would vote it a worthy part of anyone's arsenal.

    "There is nothing new under the sun but there are lots of old things we don't know."
    — Ambrose Bierce

    take a look below and scroll to 6.27.07:

    http://mtnathlete.com/archive/id9.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. After further consideration, I think the movement is best suited for solo use, specifically, moderate or heavy efforts. The concept of taking the bar from the hang position, passing it through the front squat, and then overhead is extremely valuable. Eliminating the added momentum generated by pulling from the ground mandates accelerated velocity in the hips and faster transitions receiving the load. Both crucial measures in basic O-lift fundamentals. My contention for utilizing this in repetitive fashion under time constraint stems from the avoidance of preprogramming inherent slop. The earlier example of resetting the feet is dire for this movement, failure to do so removes commonality with associated techniques; voiding utility and reinforcing error. Similar to recent revelations regarding the use of "ground to overhead", certain critical components are misplaced under the guidance of speed. As seen all too many times, important aspects and finite procedure are bypassed in an effort to shave the clock. Those particular elements lost in time are often essential components. I'm not absolving myself of guilt in this area, just defining parameters to circumvent unwelcome opportunity.

    ReplyDelete