The descending ladder compliments the inverse relationship between fatigue and reps. As one increases, the other decreases, all made possible by the incorporated rest. Adding an emom tempo permits the execution of a one movement ladder. A smooth flow was imperative to finish this high maintenance and multifaceted movement within each allotted minute. The true crux was regenerating enough nervous system amperage to fire off ten solid power snatches. Getting the weight over head professionally is more of a crux than the weight itself; therefore, this format would serve as a great warm up or cool down with lighter weight. Otherwise, 155# every two minutes would've been a better choice. The second evolution married a conventional and austere movement in a volatile odd couple, one that quickly strayed from the standard push/pull relationship. The question that demands an answer is which modality is superior for "real life" fitness? If both are useful, then in what quantity and ratio? Although impressive, the gym performance is best for the gym. The only way to train for the battle field is on the battle field.
The descending ladder compliments the inverse relationship between fatigue and reps. As one increases, the other decreases, all made possible by the incorporated rest. Adding an emom tempo permits the execution of a one movement ladder.
ReplyDeleteA smooth flow was imperative to finish this high maintenance and multifaceted movement within each allotted minute. The true crux was regenerating enough nervous system amperage to fire off ten solid power snatches. Getting the weight over head professionally is more of a crux than the weight itself; therefore, this format would serve as a great warm up or cool down with lighter weight. Otherwise, 155# every two minutes would've been a better choice.
The second evolution married a conventional and austere movement in a volatile odd couple, one that quickly strayed from the standard push/pull relationship. The question that demands an answer is which modality is superior for "real life" fitness? If both are useful, then in what quantity and ratio? Although impressive, the gym performance is best for the gym. The only way to train for the battle field is on the battle field.